2018-08-09 15:12 GMT+03:00 Lucie Kaffee <[email protected]>: > I understand the wish for a more transparent process. (What a good thing > there is the possibility to suggest amendments to the CoC!) > But I would like you to consider the following: Someone, who was warned, or > even blocked, might change their behavior. Should we still keep a public > list of all people that ever had contact with the CoC committee? It seems > to me that this could easily be used as a shaming and blaming list. If the > block is over and the person wants to change their behavior, it might be > hard for them to start with a clean sheet if we keep a backlog public of > everyone. I'd see it not only as a privacy issue for the people reporting, > but also the reported.
So basically your're saying that the wiki way of doing things, were blocks and bans are public and often contain the offending diff, is bad and should not be followed. Is the CoC committee really the venue where such a decision should be made? Shouldn't the wiki way be the default *unless* the community decided otherwise? Strainu _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
