Platonides <Platonides <at> gmail.com> writes: > On 14/11/11 00:00, Rusty Burchfield wrote: > > These are my results. > > http://pastebin.com/tgNTfXzx > > There seems to be bugs in that list that are already closed. (Should > need-review be removed from those bugs?) > Manually running that query, I see 218 bugs, 240 on your list. > Indeed, I don't see how did your script get to > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8627 (plus determine that > it contained a valid patch).
Please read the details at the top of the pastebin. ;-) The Patch number is an attachment ID not a bug ID. There are multiple patches on some bugs so they show up as multiple lines in the list. Also, Reedy resolved one of the bugs after I compiled the list (there were 219). > > If anyone wants to mess with the code (it is in Ruby), please let me > > know and I will get it up on GitHub. > > Not the best candidate language for us :/ Sorry, PHP won't ever be my first choice for fun projects. I won't be hurt if no one is interested in hacking on it. BTW, if you reply-all it is a lot easier for people in digest mode to respond. :-) ~Rusty _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
