On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:55:13 -0700, Thomas Gries <[email protected]> wrote:

> collecting previously mailed information and started a new section
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git_Graphical_User_Interfaces#Viewers_%28repository_web_browsers%29
>
> browsers for "git":
>
> My starting point was
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/438163/whats-the-best-web-interface-for-git-repositories
> gitalist http://www.gitalist.com/
> gitweb http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/Gitweb
> cgit http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
> FishEye (Atlassian, not free)
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=operations%2Fpuppet.git
> https://gitorious.org/mediawiki/mediawiki-trunk-phase3/trees/master
> http://gitlabhq.com/
>
>
> I checked all of the mentioned git viewers.
>
> As far as I can see, most of the mentioned viewers lack an apparent  
> function to view _arbitrary_ "diffs".
> I like the ViewVC function "select for diffs" which allows easily to  
> compare any version, and (currently) still prefer the ViewVC interface.
>
Gitalist seams to have a decent diff selection feature (it's like our  
history page):
http://example.gitalist.com/fcgi2.git/summary
Redmine has similar:
http://opensource.pragmatic-source.com/projects/multilog-axfr/repository

Another thing missing from GitWeb is a good graph browser.
cgit seams to have a decent ascii one:
http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/log/
Gitorious has one:
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/graph/master

> ViewVC's screen layout is clear and well arranged even on smaller  
> screens; most of the listed git viewers I have tested this weekend are  
> complex.
>
> Further proposals and comments can now please got to the new section
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git_Graphical_User_Interfaces#Viewers_%28repository_web_browsers%29
>
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git_Web_Viewers

> Tom
>

-- 
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to