> 
>     On 03 January 2017 at 14:44 John Levin <anterote...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 

<snip>

> 
>      My user page is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Technolalia
> 

Hello John - we actually exchanged mails a few years ago

> 
> 
>     My Phd has involved a lot of digging around for historic statutes, and
>     this has led to a side project, and one that I hope will work with
>     Wikipedia. In short, I have OCRd around 80 volumes of various editions
>     of the Statutes At Large and the Public General Statutes. They cover the
>     period from Magna Carta, up to 1875 (after which digitized volumes are
>     scarce). I believe they contain a more or less complete set of public
>     acts from about 1765 to 1875. Although it is obviously alphanumeric soup
>     at the moment, I am working on automatic correction of the more obvious
>     errors, and on producing decent metadata.
> 

Wikisource can host primary rsource material, subject to some caveats.

> 
> 
>     My aims are to make finding legislation easier, to make it easier to
>     examine, both by eye and by machine, and to produce reliable metadata
>     from and for it. My immediate priority is to extract the tables of
>     contents from the collections, and build a reliable list of acts with
>     regnal codes and full titles (correctly spelled).
> 
>     My site for this project:
>     http://statutes.org.uk
>     and my github repo:
>     https://github.com/Anterotesis/statutes
> 
>     Wikipedia has many useful lists of statutes, some entries on particular
>     acts, & in wikicommons a few of the texts. I very much want my work to
>     contribute to wikipedia and improve this aspect of it.
> 

Well, laudable doesn't begin to cover it.

> 
>     I've been talking with Andrew Gray, mainly with regard to Wikidata, but
> such is the size
>     of the task I think more hands will be needed. & of course I don't want
>     to start making great changes without consultation.
> 

Wikidata is a good place to develop metadata. It can do that in conjunction with
Wikisource, but I wouldn't want to imply that is the only way.

Charles
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to