Hello All,

Thanks all for your contributions to this. It's been very helpful.

We will take on the feedback and come up with a list of particular
equipment we will buying and let the community know in due course.

Best

Stuart

On 29 July 2016 at 06:30, Harry Mitchell <hjmw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Stuart,
>
> It's not what you asked, I know, but WMUK should consider investing in
> some new merchandise - using Wikipedia branding, not the WMUK logo because
> nobody has any idea what the latter is, which sort of defeats the point. I
> (re-)learnt at Wikimania that hats can be very useful outreach tools.
>
> Harry Mitchell
> http://enwp.org/User:HJ
> +44 (0) 7507 536 971
> Skype: harry_j_mitchell
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Rex X <freeze...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> The only thing I can say about microphones is that when I was recording
>> bands in
>> the 1970s, we mostly used Shure SM57s and SM58s. They were expensive but
>> unbelievably rugged. You could use a cheap condenser microphone to mike
>> up a
>> flute or for "filling in", but the SM57s always sounded better when
>> miking up
>> acoustic guitars, drums, etc. I never found anything as good as the SM58s
>> for
>> vocals.
>>
>> I guess there must be newer, cheaper mikes around now, but I'm out of
>> touch with
>> modern studio equipment.
>>
>> --
>> Rexx
>>
>>
>> > On 27 July 2016 at 16:01 geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 22 July 2016 at 22:40, Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > If you want something that can cover the whole range, then Sigma do
>> some
>> > > quite nice superzoom lenses - I've been using an 18-200mm stabilised
>> lens as
>> > > my every-day lens on my 60D since 2010. There's a newer (2012-era)
>> 18-250mm
>> > > lens that looks better:
>> > > https://www.ephotozine.com/article/sigma-18-250mm-f-3-5-
>> 6-3-dc-macro-os-hsm-lens-review-19470
>> > > costing around £200-£280 - but I'm a bit out of date on the newest
>> lenses...
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Mike
>> >
>> > Well that would certainly solve the problem of providing a decent
>> > reach without lens duplication although I'd be surprised if it didn't
>> > distort a fair bit at the wider end.
>> >
>> > And while I'll accept the blame this conversation has been largely
>> > about lenses. Anyone got anything to say about microphones?
>> >
>> > --
>> > geni
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>



-- 
*Stuart Prior*
*Project Coordinator*
*Wikimedia UK*
+44 20 7065 0990

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).

*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to