Competing with Wikipedia (replying to Fabian; sorry for breaking the threading) always struck me as being a bit like arguing with yourself. Wikipedia is far from flawless (as a concept, as a project, or as an encyclopaedia), but the whole point of it is to collect and distribute information for free. What's to compete *with*?
Harry Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971 Skype: harry_j_mitchell From: Gordon Joly <gordon.j...@pobox.com> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Friday, 2 January 2015, 18:35 Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] new book on Wikipedia On 02/01/15 16:04, Simon Knight wrote: > Might be of interest. > > > Indeedy! :-) Gordo _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
