That looks a very interesting tool. Definitely worth adding to the wiki page as related work that we could potentially make use of (if you permit, Fae; the source code is not open is it?)
Michael > Have a play with > <http://tools.wmflabs.org/faebot/cgi-bin/TARDIS.py?file=TARDIS.jpg&category=TARDIS>, > it would not be hard to adapt into reports. > > This gave a way of solving arguments in Commons Deletion Requests by > comparing a file's size and pixel resolution to others in similar > categories. There was no easy way of doing this on-wiki. Knowing that > a file is in the top 25% even by this crude measure, suddenly makes it > appear more valuable, while a doubtful file in the bottom 10% seems a > good candidate for deletion if it is a marginal out of scope case. > > Setting "hard" measures for size or resolution is not always > meaningful. Many small images may have educational use and have no > higher resolution equivalent, though in my size comparison report > (off-line) I do have a version that plucks out the smallest images in > a category and passes them back as a re-paste-able gallery for review. > > Fae > -- > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
