The question is not whether the sculpture itself is permanent but whether the display is permanent. It sounds as if this was not.
Michael > On 17 Feb 2014, at 20:42, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Photographers active in the UK may be interested in this successful > deletion proposal: > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Horse_at_Water_-_Marble_Arch.JPG > > made on the basis that "the sculpture was not permanent, but > temporary. It was commissioned for Daylesford in Gloucestershire, but > at first stood in 2009 temporarily in London. There is no freedom of > panorama in England for temporary sculptures and therefore the license > is invalid." > > I intend to call for undeletion. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
