So go along to the Board meeting and ask directly - I've no doubt they'll hand you a copy after they've done whatever is still left to do. Then the discussion can begin in earnest. Perhaps it is nothing more sinister than getting 5 Board members in a room to listen to a couple of things say 'OK, we agree' - and that is happening in less than 72 hours. I am sure the first action the Board will want when it meets will be 'put it online' and 'let the discussion start'
-----Original Message----- From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton Sent: 06 February 2013 18:55 To: UK Wikimedia mailing list Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Governance review On 6 February 2013 18:49, steve virgin <st...@mediafocusuk.com> wrote: > Tango > > > > I’ve always said you have a heart of gold Tom. Give the guys in London > 3-4 more days and we’ll all see it I am sure. If it is longer than > that I’ll complain too, jointly with you. The board meeting is in less than 3 days - Chris has said he wants the community to have a chance to review it before the board meeting, so they need to publish in the next 24 hours or so to meet his target. What do you think "the guys in London" should be doing over the next 3-4 days? As I've said repeatedly, and no-one has attempted to counter, it doesn't make sense to prepare a response beyond "we're starting a discussion" before the discussion has taken place. Why can't we all be reviewing the report at the same time? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
