On 16 Nov 2012, at 15:30, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16 November 2012 15:26, Stevie Benton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> It doesn't seem to be working! >> >> We do ask that if you've taken part in any WMUK activity that you add it to >> the report if you're able. I'm not sure why that seems to have dropped off, >> but there have been plenty of reminders and calls for content. > > Perhaps because the "report" is a really dull surrogate for a proper > newsletter, allowing the community an editorial voice? And > contributing to our public life. Such as the Signpost. And instead > looks like the fulfilment of a reporting requirement of a box-ticking > kind. But it seems to work for the GLAM newsletter, where e.g. there is a 'UK report' with pretty much the same intent as the 'Wikimedia UK report'? http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/October_2012/Contents/UK_report Would a simple rename make people feel more able to contribute, or does there need to be more change than that? Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
