On 19 September 2011 16:58, Thomas Dalton > > innherently beneficial to the public. That's why "In Re Shaw" isn't > applicable to our application in the slightest. That case is about > research into a new alphabet and I think most people would agree that > the proposed research isn't likely to benefit the public (since it's a > ridiculous proposal that will never actually be implemented in a > million years).
Um, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shavian_alphabet> and implemented in Unicode in 2003: <http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/ch13.pdf#G17013> Andrew _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
