Yes, indeed I think the main problem is that such first-hand information from the subject of the article are unlikely to be backed by third-party reliable sources, which is why I think OTRS is the best way to do it - using BLP rules to circumvent the usual verifiability guidelines.
On 7 February 2011 23:58, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 February 2011 23:56, Liam Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Would it not be easier/better to put all the corrections in the article's > > talkpage? > > > This would probably be the best approach. Of course, then you need to > find citations for the lot ... > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
