Take a look at [[MOS:INTRO]] for why it's the length it is. > cool article, summary/introduction too long. summary should be made short > and concise. i can't figure out why refs are starting numbering at 6 in > the summary section. I will give it a few minutes. > > [[user_talk:Ecoman24]], formerly [[user:fngosa]] > > > --- On Wed, 10/14/09, u7...@students.keele.ac.uk > <u7...@students.keele.ac.uk> wrote: > > From: u7...@students.keele.ac.uk <u7...@students.keele.ac.uk> > Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] A request for assistance. > To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 3:36 AM > > Hey everyone, > I realise this probably isn't the proper place to ask, but I'm in need > of some assistance. I've been working on [[International Space > Station]] for about three years now, and it's really close to finally > being able to pass FAC. Unfortunately, it needs a good strong copyedit > to "make it say what it means and mean what it says", and I'm so > indoctrinated by the prose I can't do a good job. Requests to the > overworked Guild of Copyeditors haven't worked, so I was wondering if > one of the wonderful WMUK folks fancies taking a look at it and boldly > sorting out my geeky prose? :-) > > James Humphreys (Colds7ream) > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
