On Thu, December 11, 2008 14:06, Thomas Dalton wrote: > Yes, but WMUK 1.0 was always very small and wasn't really noticed by > anyone (some in the media may have known it existed, but that's about > it).
Before David gets in and screams how wrong that statement is I'll just point out that we (David and I) have ended up in just about all the press directories sfaiwct such that "some" in the media is very inaccurate! Alison _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
