Farah, you spoke my mind. I read institutional commitment to resolving this point of the Strategy recs (an effective Charter + Council), using a less drawn-out method to work through the remaining issues.
But the latest feedback from the committee liaisons has raised doubts. So it would reduce uncertainty and tension for the WMF to reaffirm its commitment, via the liaisons or some other representative. Sam 🌍🌏🌎🌑 On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 5:43 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Victoria, > The fact that the three of you are running for re-election should not > preclude "a firm commitment [by the WMF] to catalyzing a successful charter > + council". After all, this is not a personal commitment of individual > board members (and please correct me if you were in fact asking for an > individual commitment, SJ). You still have half a year on the board to > take part in decision-making processes before a new board is confirmed. > Regards, > Farah > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines > at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/WFQ7G6KIBJPIYPHZOW3ZHMXY7SS6EI3M/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/FXFR3JLONPBPHI42SXQH6S3S6KOPT56G/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
