Den tis 30 jan. 2024 kl 02:37 skrev effe iets anders < [email protected]>:
> I can see one solution to that (albeit farfetched): an analogue to a super > rigorous referencing approach. I am imagining it's possible to verify in an > automated way that an edited video is exclusively constructed out of a list > of cited materials. So if we would be able to build a database of freely > licensed raw materials that can be sourced from (HUGE if, I know!) > It sounds like you are describing Videowiki: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/VideoWiki (where the database is Commons). While valuable, I think that original content is needed, be it homemade animations, or videos from events or places recorded by the user and never published anywhere else. /Jan
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/OGJ5OJZIYHVEJGD6M4NIT3GMVQM6L6SS/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
