Dear Wikimedians,I would like to share with you the editorial (written in
French) of an academic magazine related to ChatGPT. Through what it says and
quotes made in particular, I think that WE Wikimedians, just need to rethink
the way we share knowledge and information through our different projects
(platforms) in order to achieve our goals set for the year 2030 : To be the
essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem...
In bold the relevant points of the editorial.
Thank you and have a nice day
______
ChatGPTIt can do everything: write an essay, summarise a lecture, solve
equations and answer complex questions fluently. And it can do it all so
quickly. Its name? ChatGPT.
This "conversational agent" based on artificial intelligence, which appeared in
November 2022, is delighting students and giving teachers cold sweats because,
even if it is not free of clumsiness or inaccuracies, it is revolutionising
evaluation methods.
So what to do? It's hard to ignore it. Censor it? According to Frédéric
Schoenaers, Vice-President of Education, it is preferable to integrate it into
the range of teaching practices while taking into account its high potential.
"It's an opportunity to change our expectations of students, to think about how
we test their knowledge." If ChatGPT can pass a test, then modify the test.
Without stress. After all, the calculator hasn't replaced the maths lesson._____
Le Quinzième Jour - Quadrimestriel de l'ULiège - May-August 2023 - Number 285 -
ISSN : 2593-5984 - www.uliege.be/LQJ____________________________________Georges
Fodouop
IT Manager - Wikimedia TrainerCo-founder Wikimedia CameroonUser : Geugeor
Le mercredi 17 mai 2023 à 09:09:28 UTC+2, Kiril Simeonovski
<[email protected]> a écrit :
Dear Wikimedians,
Two days ago, a participant in one of our edit-a-thons consulted ChatGPT when
writing an article on the Macedonian Wikipedia that did not exist on any other
language edition. ChatGPT provided some output, but the problem was how to cite
it.
The community on the Macedonian Wikipedia has not yet had a discussion on this
matter and we do not have any guidelines. So, my main questions are the
following:
* Can ChatGPT be used as a reliable source and, if yes, how would the citation
look like?
* Are there any ongoing community discussions on introducing guidelines?
My personal opinion is that ChatGPT should be avoided as a reliable source, and
only the original source where the algorithm gets the information from should
be used.
Best regards,Kiril_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/WMGIBNPN5JNJGUOCLWFCCPD7EL5YN6KU/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HD2OI6C4B6U2PORP4SAXI7KHPTKSVY6P/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
