An interesting standoff. I don’t suppose anyone has analysed the potential 
losses and gains associated with each option. If that is even possible, 
considering the number of unknowns. I agree that it is taking an amazingly long 
time, and it is not obvious why.

Cheers,

Peter

 

From: Chico Venancio [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 05 January 2023 16:56
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Upcoming vote on the revised Enforcement Guidelines 
for the Universal Code of Conduct

 

The heart of the matter is why are we voting? What is the threshold that will 
enact the UCoC?

> Who it would be respected by.

 

WMF and the board. We've had 3 and a half years of discussion on the UCoC and a 
majority vote to approve enforcement guidelines, and yet no functioning UCoC.

>As volunteers, if a significant part of the community sufficiently dislikes 
>the proposed UCOC, we simply lose them, and some may become vociferous 
>opponents because reasonably fixable issues were ignored. Taking longer and 
>getting it closer to right is to me a better plan. You may not care about some 
>of the issues that needed to be fixed, but some of us do.

As volunteers, if a significant part of the community sufficiently dislikes the 
status quo we simple lose them, and some may become vociferous opponents 
because reasonably fixable issues were ignored. Taking over 3 years to 
implement an Universal Code of Conduct is to me a bad plan. You may not care 
about some of the issues that needed to be fixed, but some of us do.

 

Cheers,


Chico Venancio

 

Em qui., 5 de jan. de 2023 às 11:22, Peter Southwood 
<[email protected]> escreveu:

It seems that sorting out problems that are pointed out during an approval 
process is not an unreasonable thing to do, as leaving them unchanged would be 
irresponsible and extremely likely to cause other problems later. Asking 
whether a vote result will be respected misses the issue of who it would be 
respected by. Can you clarify that? As volunteers, if a significant part of the 
community sufficiently dislikes the proposed UCOC, we simply lose them, and 
some may become vociferous opponents because reasonably fixable issues were 
ignored. Taking longer and getting it closer to right is to me a better plan. 
You may not care about some of the issues that needed to be fixed, but some of 
us do.

Cheers, Peter

 

From: Chico Venancio [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 04 January 2023 20:48
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Upcoming vote on the revised Enforcement Guidelines 
for the Universal Code of Conduct

 

Hi Patrick,
Five months ago I wrote in the Movement Strategy forum:[1]

Could we have clear criteria for approval of the guidelines? I find it pretty 
frustrating that a vote was taken and the majority is being ignored to review a 
few points that are not even central to the functioning of the UCoC. Can we 
suspend these sections for further review and enforce the UCoC now?

The first reference I find to UCoC is in june of 2019, and I fear any 
participation in this now 3 year long process of creating a universal code of 
conduct is pointless, as goalposts can always be shifted later.

 

Could we have an answer? What is the goalpost here? Will this vote result be 
respected?

 

Kind regards,

 

[1] 
https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/revisions-to-the-universal-code-of-conduct-ucoc-enforcement-guidelines/377/15?u=chicocvenancio



Chico Venancio 

 

Em qua., 4 de jan. de 2023 às 15:41, Patrick Earley <[email protected]> 
escreveu:

 
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Announcement/Voting_1>
 You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

Hello all,

In mid-January 2023, the  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines>
 Enforcement Guidelines for the  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct> 
Universal Code of Conduct will undergo a second community-wide ratification 
vote. [1][2] This follows  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Enforcement_guidelines/Voting/Results>
 the March 2022 vote, which resulted in a majority of voters supporting the 
Enforcement Guidelines. [3] During the vote, participants helped highlight 
important community concerns. The Board’s  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee>
 Community Affairs Committee requested that these areas of concern be reviewed. 
[4]

The volunteer-led  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Drafting_committee#Revisions_Committee_members>
 Revisions Committee worked hard reviewing community input and making changes. 
[5] They updated areas of concern, such as training and affirmation 
requirements, privacy and transparency in the process, and readability and 
translatability of the document itself.

The revised Enforcement Guidelines can be viewed  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines>
 here, and a comparison of changes can be found  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Comparison>
 here. [6][7]

How to vote?

Beginning January 17, 2023, voting will be open.  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Voter_information>
 This page on Meta-wiki outlines information on how to vote using SecurePoll.

Who can vote?

The  
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Voter_information#Voting_eligibility>
 eligibility requirements for this vote are the same as for the Wikimedia Board 
of Trustees elections. See the voter information page for more details about 
voter eligibility. If you are an eligible voter, you can use your Wikimedia 
account to access the voting server.

What happens after the vote?

Votes will be scrutinized by an independent group of volunteers, and the 
results will be published on Wikimedia-l, the Movement Strategy Forum, Diff and 
on Meta-wiki. Voters will again be able to vote and share concerns they have 
about the guidelines. The Board of Trustees will look at the levels of support 
and concerns raised as they look at how the Enforcement Guidelines should be 
ratified or developed further.

On behalf of the UCoC Project Team,

Patrick

-----

[1], [6] Revised Enforcement Guidelines: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines

[2] Universal Code of Conduct: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct

[3] March 2022 vote results: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Enforcement_guidelines/Voting/Results

[4] Community Affairs Committee: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee

[5] Revisions Committee: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Drafting_committee#Revisions_Committee

[7] Comparison page: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Comparison

[8] Voter information: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Voter_information

[9] Voting eligibility: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Revised_enforcement_guidelines/Voter_information#Voting_eligibility

 

 

-- 

Patrick Earley

Lead Trust & Safety Policy Manager 

Wikimedia Foundation

[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/M4GCCGMDV5MUV7UYBFLHH6B5EFCDQJEV/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

 


 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 

Virus-free. 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 www.avg.com

 

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/VOKFVRR6AMYKL47PXLYI2CL7E26ZU3GK/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/OUSO4MZ5Y4NVQDQNTHNBYEBUZWWGENFT/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to