I think the problem is that the pathological people, having been called out on being pathological, decided to double down on the original complainant. See also: Gamergate, a clearly apt and apposite comparison.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 19:48, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm sad to hear that. I would not want a victim to go with a request for > help to WMF, local functionaries, an arbitration committee, or anyone else, > and have the situation end up worse rather than better. I don't know what > to recommend. Perhaps you could ask the stewards what they think. > > I am also sad to hear about the difficulties regarding the situation in > which you think that someone was at risk of self-harm. I think that the > situation you described is probably appropriate for review by the > management of WMF Trust and Safety so that they can take a second look. I > encourage you to contact them. > > I am finding this conversation to be rather depressing, but I am glad that > we are having it, because this is one way of developing solutions. > > Pine > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
