Shouldn't articles be judged independently of who exactly wrote them and for what reason?
If an article reads well, has good content, is sourced, neutral etc, what's the issue exactly? On 24 May 2018 at 12:28, Gnangarra <[email protected]> wrote: > I find this rather disturbing that Airtasker accepts adds for people > wanting to have articles written, on wikipedia. > > The person writing the add is asking someone to violate WMF terms & > Conditions as you can some of the respondents are indicating that they do > this regularly > > https://www.airtasker.com/tasks/copywriter-for-a- > wikipedia-article-10031171/ > > Would it be prudent for the WMF legal to contact Airtasker, highlight our > T&Cs and have them block such requests from being posted. Airtasker > themselves also gets paid when people write Wikipedia articles > > -- > GN. > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page > WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com > Out now: A.Gaynor, P. Newman and P. Jennings (eds.), *Never Again: > Reflections on Environmental Responsibility after Roe 8*, UWAP, 2017. > Order > here > <https://uwap.uwa.edu.au/products/never-again- > reflections-on-environmental-responsibility-after-roe-8> > . > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
