At the level of generalization of the cited statement in the WP article, it is pretty much impossible to approach objectivity in economics articles. I doubt that an instance of bias should lead us to include the kind of unscientific economics that we happen to find agreeable. I specifically refer to the kind of Tinkerbell economics in the YouTube video.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:44 PM, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote: > The more I survey different language wikipedias, the more I am > convinced an effort at the chapters level is needed to address this > problem: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/ > 2018-April/006256.html > > It occurred to me that this Max Roser video might help: > > A Selfish Argument for Making the World a Better Place – Egoistic Altruism > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvskMHn0sqQ > > I hope in particular that objectivists and former objectivists would > share their thoughts on it. > > Best regards, > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Dennis C. During _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
