(People keep mentioning a post limit, and I'm sure I'm going to hit it.
 I'll see if someone can give me a temporary exception, but I also
wanted to warn that I'm in back to back meetings for the next 3 days and
intend to deliberately go quiet because of that.  In the evenings, I
plan to be writing up my notes and reflecting on what I'm learning.)

On 2/29/16 7:41 AM, Chris Sherlock wrote:
> Not at all, I apologise for any confusion I may have brought to bare
> here.

No problem.

> FWIW, I don’t think anyone is opposed to a better search engine. I’m
> rather impressed you had built one back in the day :-)

Well, it wasn't anything too amazing. :)  It wasn't long before Magnus
Manske did the radical thing of actually using a real database, making
my amateurish efforts a moot point.

> I was very harsh in a reply to a blogpost by Lila on the 16th [1],
> and frankly I regret the degree of hostility in that comment - I read
> it now and cringe a little. 

We've all been through a very emotional time.

> Is what I’m saying is the truth, then I do hope someone has gotten in
> contact with the Knight Foundation to clarify the application? 

My understanding is that the Knight Foundation is fine.  Keep in mind
that many people have a mental model of grant making that works like this:

1. A program is announced to fund projects of a specific kind.
2. Someone writes up an application and mails it off, fingers crossed.
3. The funder decides and announces the award.

In reality, it's more a conversation with multiple meetings and
conversations.

> If you could please advise then why we added dramatic language that
> gave an impression we were building something we aren’t to the Knight
> Foundation, who then funded the first tranche, then I’d appreciate
> it.

I wasn't involved but it seems to be a non-issue.  As I am here in SF,
I'll try to figure out who to ask more about our relationship with
Knight.  But as I say, my rough understanding is that there isn't a
problem there.



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to