This marvellous thread goes a long way to prove that we are in possession of a very able, considerate, and polite WMF-oriented community in addition to the "silent" community that goes on editing our sites. But it also makes me wonder whether the BoT as a body maintains its silence about the issues? If they have answered somewhere else, please someone point to it.
Regards, Thyge 2016-02-19 23:24 GMT+01:00 Delphine Ménard <[email protected]>: > Here you go SJ, > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Sam Klein <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Delphine writes: > >> <epic snip> > >> We freaking built an encyclopedia, of course we can take care of it > > without > >> having to fear everyone and their brother! And while an organisation is > > not > >> a wiki, and revert not always an option, I'm pretty sure that > > > ... reverting sometimes *is* a good idea. And maybe the only idea. > > > Delphine > -- > @notafish > > NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get > lost. > Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive - > http://blog.notanendive.org > Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
