There was a finding of civil, not criminal, liability in the case. Against the companies as a whole not individuals.
Generally such never becomes individual liability or criminality. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Ricordisamoa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Has Arnnon been actually convicted of a felony? Where is presumption of > innocence? > The firing was part of a larger system he seems unlikely to have set up on > his own volition. > Look at his face > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arnnon_Geshuri_-_January_2016_by_Myleen_Hollero.jpg > > Il 08/01/2016 17:43, Kevin Gorman ha scritto: >> I'm going to publicly second (or third, or fifth,) the idea that given >> Arnnon's role in an incident involving illegal anti-poaching agreements he >> should either be removed from the board with haste, or the board should >> publish an incredibly good reason as to why he should remain on it. Keep >> in mind that Arnnon wasn't a bystander to this scandal, he actively fired a >> recruiter who failed to follow the terms of an illegal anti-poaching >> agreement in less than one hour of being informed about it in the first >> place. I like to think of Wikimedia as a relatively humane movement, and >> there are very few situations where I'm comfortable with someone who is >> that comfortable with the idea of firing an employee (who had presumably >> been there for some time) within sixty minutes of learning the employee >> didn't follow an illegal agreement having the degree of influence over the >> movement that members of the Board of Trustees have. >> >> The Wikimedia movement is not a movement whose direction should be set by >> someone with that degree of callousness - and the fact that he happily >> participated in the sort of anti-competitive agreement he did, which he >> must have known was illegal and which exposed his former employers to not >> insignificant liability, brings forth significant doubt as to whether or >> not he can reasonably be trusted to carry out his fiduciary duties as a >> trustee of the Wikimedia Foundation. >> >> ---- >> Kevin Gorman >> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Andreas Kolbe<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> My apologies. I just noticed the resolutions were in fact added on January >>> 6, 2016.[1] >>> >>> They are dated December 9, 2015. Both appointments were unanimous. >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Resolutions&diff=104423&oldid=104354 >>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andreas Kolbe<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The resolutions and voting records for these recent appointments have not >>>> yet been posted tohttps://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolutions >>>> >>>> Could the page please be brought up to date? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines >>> New messages to:[email protected] >>> Unsubscribe:https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines >> at:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines >> New messages to:[email protected] >> Unsubscribe:https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
