On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Denny, thanks for supporting this issue moving on. Before few remarks > > I would respond inline, I want to say that the *draft* of the idea to > > make community assembly have been published by Pharos: > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_Council_Compact > > > > I think it is a good idea to have a sort of community council. To give > credit, Guy Kawasaki just recently proposed something along these lines in > internal discussions. My first take is that it would be good to have some > representation and governance of our movement, not just WMF. It would make > everyone's lives easier, too - it would be easier to consult, seek advise, > etc. > > I've been also thinking about revitalizing our Advisory Board - the way I > would like to see it would be dividing it into (a) community (b) tech and > (c) academic subgroups, available for immediate consulting and feedback. > > This definitely does not collide with the idea of a community council in > the form that you're proposing, I think. It is worth further discussion. > Should it be continued on meta? > Yes, we'd welcome folks to read the proposal on meta at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_Council_Compact Sign up there if you like the basic idea, and offer comments and improvements at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Community_Council_Compact Thanks, Pharos _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
