I agree with Andy. Well, if it is not a election pursuant to bylaws IV (3c) why it was always announced as such [1]. So it was de-facto a election. Wasn't it?
(imho) It is Ethically it is not okay to remove a "elected" member whiteout public discussion. [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/Board_elections/2015 > From: [email protected] > Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:05:25 +0000 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcement about changes to the Board > > On 2 January 2016 at 10:41, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The Baylaws call them " Community-selected Trustees" - not elected (sec. 3c > > of art. IV) . > > But - as I pointed out earlier - the language used in public-and > community facing communications refers to "elections"; and - as I also > pointed out - this should be changed to correct the false impression > that is being given.. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
