2015-12-29 10:15 GMT+01:00 Isarra Yos <[email protected]>:
> It says a lot, but just what that is depends entirely on the context. And > for community members who voted for him, that context could mean we should > also no longer have confidence in him elsewhere in the projects, or in the > board, or have no bearing on either thing whatsoever. Not knowing just > means there's no indication what to trust. I'd rather lose the trust and confidence in those 8 Board members than in him without knowing what was the cause for his disbarment. ;) Maybe the Board by-laws have to be changed, too. Throwing out a community-elected member like this, without providing a reason, is no way to deal with the community who elected this member. It should be mandatory that the Board provides reasons together with the announcement to avoid exactly this kind of discussions and speculations, not a day (or more) later. And as for no-cause disbarments for community-elected members in a community-driven environment - uhm... I don't need to delve into that, everyone can see the problem. The Board should just not be allowed to disbar community-elected members without a cause, as that undermines the authority of the community over those seats on the Board. Th. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
