On Nov 8, 2015 9:34 PM, "Quim Gil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> the Q&A included more details: > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#When_has_been_Superprotect_used.3F > > The main reason to act upon Superprotect now is the updated product > development process > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process> in the > drafts, which we want to discuss and agree with the communities. This new > process should make Superprotect unnecessary; removing it upfront was a > logical step. > > I have added these points in the Q&A: > > Why is Superprotect being removed? > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#Why_is_Superprotect_being_removed.3F > > Why is the WMF doing this now? > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#Why_is_the_WMF_doing_this_now.3F > > I hope this clarifies that sentence. Referring to "misbehaviour" in this context is extremely offensive; the initial use of superprotect was not a response to "misbehaviour". _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
