*q.e.d.* no arguments, nothing more to add, just ''ad hominem'', and provocations.
On 21 October 2015 at 13:08, Ilario Valdelli <[email protected]> wrote: > I will be simple like explaining it to a baby. > > On 21.10.2015 16:29, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton wrote: > >> How about less provocations, attempts to breakdown the conversation with >> violence, and support our idea in a civilized manner ? So " it's not good >> to give publicly comments on the candidates.", why do you think that? >> > > I think nothing. I administer a list where the entities involved in the > process decided that. > > Decision taken by these entities, I execute their decision. > > I am, politely, addressing you to the right place to discuss it. > > >> I am not understanding your affirmation, because you did not offer any >> argument that corroborates to your statement. >> >> > Yes, I know, you do not understand. > > Anyway we can continue "ad libitum" for the sample reason that you don't > like it but it's not up to me to support your dislike. > > Regards > > > -- > Ilario Valdelli > Wikimedia CH > Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens > Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre > Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera > Switzerland - 8008 Zürich > Tel: +41764821371 > http://www.wikimedia.ch > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton [email protected] +55 11 979 718 884 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
