Looking at "male-female" and "female-male", and considering the much-cited 15% female editor ratio, it seems women are much more overwrite-happy than men.
Then again, 139:110 are not exactly numbers one does want to base statistics on... On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:25 AM Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]> wrote: > 2015-08-14 2:20 GMT+02:00 Fæ <[email protected]>: > > > 15716 > > > First of all it seems that vast majority of Commons users do not select > their gender so they are "none". It obviously spoils the rest of the > statistics. Would be good to add to it numbers of males, females and > "nones" included, so it would be more clear which group has generally > stronger tendency for overwriting. For example strong "overwriter" can > make a 1000 overwrites a year, and a weak one just 1. Such "strong" > overwrites can also spoil this statistics. For example - one "strong" > female overwrite can easily make all overwrites and the rest of females are > not overwriting at all :-) The same apply the other way - i.e. we can say > that women are more vulnerable to be overwriten if you divide numbers of > overwrites by number of females and compare it to the other groups. > > > -- > Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz > http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek > http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/ > http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/[email protected]> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
