On 27 February 2014 22:03, Galileo Vidoni <[email protected]> wrote: > We remain convinced that something is fundamentally wrong when its > practical result is self-inflicting the highest possible loss of contents. >
No that would come from accepting the sweat of the brow doctrine. > And we remain convinced that there is space for a way more prudent > implementation of URAA that prevents deleting educational resources until > there is complete copyright information and no legal alternative, which to > our understanding (and to our interpretation of WMF's communications) can > mean waiting for DMCA takedown notices. > We could do that but it pretty much removes commons only advantage over say imgur or flickr. We want the images on commons to be free. Not simply stuff no one has got around to complaining about yet, -- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
