No, I mean, that's what article talk page is for.
It's close to useless to get a contributor admit COI by ticking a box.
1) He won't do it.
2) It's much better to add a box to ?action=edit, when a page is created,
asking the contributor to type something in manually ("what motivated you to
create article? please disclose conflict of interest and affiliations to help
us help you.").
Stop adding complexity, bureaucracy and terms. The learning curve is full
enough of paperwork, terms, badges, and reviewing as is.
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, at 16:47, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Why ?
> Thanks.
> GerardM
>
>
> On 22 February 2014 21:13, Gryllida <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I do mind 5 and 6, since their submissions would be deleted aggressively.
> > I feel that you may introduce a marker if you want, but not a separate
> > queue.
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, at 2:25, rupert THURNER wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > could wmf please extend the mediawiki software in the following way:
> > > 1. it should knows "groups"
> > > 2. allow users to store an arbitrary number of groups with their profile
> > > 3. allow to select one of the "group"s joined to an edit when saving
> > > 4. add a checkbox "COI" to an edit, meaning "potential conflict of
> > interest"
> > > 5. display and filter edits marked with COI in a different color in
> > history
> > > views
> > > 6. display and filter edits done for a group in a different color in
> > > history views
> > > 7. allow members of a group to receive notifications done on the group
> > page,
> > > or when a group is mentioned in an edit/comment/talk page.
> > >
> > > reason:
> > > currently it is quite cumbersome to participate as an organisation. it is
> > > quite cumbersome for people as well to detect COI edits. the most
> > prominent
> > > examples are employees of the wikimedia foundation, and GLAMs. users tend
> > > to create multiple accounts, and try to create "company accounts". the
> > main
> > > reason for this behaviour are (examples, but of course valid general):
> > > * have a feedback page / notification page for the swiss federal archive
> > > for other users
> > > * make clear that an edit is done private or as wmf employee
> > >
> > > this then would allow the community to create new policies, e.g. the
> > german
> > > community might cease using company accounts, and switch over to this
> > > system. this proposal is purely technical. current policies can still be
> > > applied if people do not need something else, e.g. wmf employees may
> > > continue to use "sue gardner (wmf)" accounts.
> > >
> > > what you think?
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > > rupert
> > > -------------------
> > > swissGLAMour, http://wikimedia.ch
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
