Speaking in my personal capacity, I echo the surprise that the Board has decided to move a motion before they had full or close to full consensus on the issue - which is in general a departure from the usual.
I can only assume that there was a better reason behind the urgency than the need to pause and reflect 8-9 months before the next reflection period (the strategy process) actually began and that the Board will be able to share that reason in a transparent manner with the community. Best regards, Bence On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Cristian Consonni <[email protected] > wrote: > 2014-02-11 19:22 GMT+01:00 Cynthia Ashley-Nelson <[email protected]>: > > Yes, I agree that the consensus of the Board is clear. > > IMHO, I wouldn't say that for two decisions taken with 7-3 and 6-4[1], > when you can see that most of the times[2] the vote was unanimous. > > Cristian > > [1] https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2013-11-24#Movement_roles > [2] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolutions > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
