On 01/01/2014 11:33, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
What effective claim has been made against Kim Dotcom and, THAT is your
argument.
Thanks,
GerardM
The claim is that knowing that items were copyright violations, they
waited until a DMCA takedown came in before removing a link. Additional
to that they also, along with their partners, generated many links to
the same content, that is the criminal conspiracy.
The mens reas, or the wilfulness as it were, starts with the knowledge
of the violation and the decision to do nothing until a copyright claim
arrives. That could become a very expensive policy.
But hey, not my arse on the line.
On 1 January 2014 12:21, ??? <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/01/2014 07:41, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
When you go the way of comparing to Kim Dotcom to make a point, you will
have to recognise that the government has been shown to act illegally.
Consequently your argument is without real merit.
Thanks,
GerardM
The first thing that is wrong with the above is that copyright holders are
not the Government.
On 31 December 2013 20:45, ??? <[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/12/2013 15:01, Yann Forget wrote:
2013/12/31 ??? <[email protected]>
Isn't that the attitude that got Kim Dotcom into trouble?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/us-unveils-the-
case-against-kim-dotcom-revealing-e-mails-and-financial-data/
This is a typical trolling. Comparing Megaupload with Wikimedia Commons?
Don't you have better (constructive) arguments?
I'm comparing your attitude that rather than fixing the known copyright
issues upfront one should await complaints before addressing, to be
similar
to that exhibited by megaupload. An attitude that is essentially one of
"We'll get away with it for as long as possible, until someone
complains."
Meanwhile falsely advertising that the content is free to use.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6965 - Release Date: 12/31/13
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
