Can you provide any evidence that doesn't fail to address software compatibility or non-power related costs, doesn't feature the word "assume", isn't based solely on evidence from the manufacturer of the machine and is less than 3 years old?
I suspect this is a non-starter from the get-go and will be disengaging; I advise everyone else to do the same. On 29 December 2013 23:53, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > Jasper, if you can't write an email or pick up the phone asking for a > hardware quote without supporting the status quo of the Foundation > datacenter being a monument to the poster boy of corporate tax abuses, > Microsoft OEM bundling abuses, and NSA collaboration, I really can't > help you. > > If you're interested in what the long term savings can look like, see: > > http://www.cnx-software.com/2010/11/16/arm-based-embedded-servers-marvell-armada-xp/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> -- Oliver Keyes Product Analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
