On 15 December 2013 17:39, Katie Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million > uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms
The images contain metadata, which could be used for categorisation,at the book level. The whole point of the wiki model is that we make incremental steps towards completion. An analogy could be drawn with Wikipedia's "stub" articles. It's not good for us to lobby institutions to release media, and then decline to accept it. I would have liked the release to have been direct to Commons; at least, I would have liked the opportunity to debate whether to accept it. I hope that the next tome such an release is being considered, we will be in a better position to facilitate the former. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
