Salut florence, i obviously need to improve my English :) Marco suggested human checking to avoid false positives and some annotation that it happened. In my eyes the cited case is a verbatim copy of some compatible license text which could be used as an example to demonstrate what he ment. I did not see such a thing up to now and would not be 100% sure how to do it correctly. So i asked.
Rupert Am 15.11.2013 13:44 schrieb "Florence Devouard" <[email protected]>: > Hmmmm > > Rupert, > > The case you mention is unrelated to any copyright infringement (the book > is explicitely published under cc by sa. So there is no copyvio). Its > mention here is like hair falling in soup. > > Now, I think there is a developing personal feud between you and Iolenda. > It sincerely saddens me to see two people I appreciate come to such a > situation. Would you both consider talking to each other on Skype or > something like this ? Alternatively, find someone neutral and nice to help > fix things so that you can come to a mutual understanding ? > > I understand that you both see things differently, but ultimately, you > both are here to make things move on. > > Flo > > > On 11/14/13 2:36 PM, rupert THURNER wrote: > >> There is such a case in http://en.m.wikipedia.org/ >> wiki/Education_in_Cameroon, >> reference is on the talk page. would you be so kind to mark or refer to it >> correctly? >> >> rupert >> Am 13.11.2013 12:46 schrieb "Marco Chiesa" <[email protected]>: >> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Chris McKenna <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The problem isn't that we're waiting for perfection. We're waiting for >>>> >>> the >>> >>>> proportion of false positives and false negatives to fall to a level >>>> >>> where >>> >>>> don't overwhelm the true positives. >>>> >>>> >>>> To avoid false positives from mirrors, the best option is to compare a >>> text >>> as soon as it is saved. Also, you exclude certain websites from the >>> comparison because you know they're the mirrors, you exclude rollbacks, >>> ... >>> Then, it is better to have a human checking that it is really a copyvio >>> (it >>> could well be a public domain text, or another Wikipedia article). >>> >>> Marco >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
