On 26 May 2013 16:53, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can agree with the rest but this is interesting: > > Steve Zhang, 26/05/2013 08:42: > >> [...] >> >> Now, the removal of adminship of volunteer editors on the WMF wiki (among >> other changes) happened for a reason, [...] >> > > really? What reason? I've not yet heard an explanation other than "it's > our wiki and we do whatever we wish: I'll prove you in a second!". > I also agree that judging the decision is useless (it's not going to be > reverted) and that it's not our job (the WMF board should do that, I > guess), but if you know the reason then please share it because we're all > clueless about it. > > Nemo > Gayle explained her reasons in the email she sent to this list around 3 days ago, like everyone else this is all the information I have. Whether or not we agree with her reasons is a moot point, as she has noted that her decision will stand. I don't think this was ever done to make community members unhappy, and while that turned out to be one of the results, I think we should let it go. Like many things on Wikimedia, this is a discussion that has run its natural should be laid to rest, and we should move on to more productive things. Steven Zhang [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
