I'd like to come back to this - if the entity was told they were eligible (which certainly looks to be the case from the public documents), when was it discovered they were not? Obviously, putting together an FDC application is a tremendous amount of work for a chapter, and if the effort was futile from the start, then the time that Deryck and WMHK put into this could have been better spent on useful programme work instead.
Cheers, Craig Franklin On 29 April 2013 17:25, Thehelpfulone <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 Apr 2013, at 07:52, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm not familiar with the case, but reading that page, it seems that > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:WM_HK/Education_Toolkits_For_Liberal_Studies/Report#Remaining_funds > > might also have played a role for the FDC's recommendation? > > Indeed, yet it looks like there has been no (public) follow up by the paid > WMF grants staff for over a month. In addition, > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round2/Wikimedia_Hong_Kongshows > WMHK to still be an eligible entity. > > Winifred/Asaf, please can you clarify whether WMHK is still an eligible > entity and what follow up was done after that message a month ago? > > --- > Thehelpfulone > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Thehelpfulone > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
