Steven's link, without the extra "is" in it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_engagement_experiments
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Steven Walling <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jan Kučera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes this was quick (and maybe little ugly) mockup, but the idea is > simple. > > Someone from E3 team around here for comments? > > > > Hey, E3 team member here. > > I agree with Sage for sure. The real value of A/B testing this particular > change or a variation of it, is to help everyone decide what the ideal > change might be (e.g. red vs bold vs an icon) and what impact each of those > options have in comparison to each other and/or to a baseline. That way we > can still make judgement calls with the input of design expertise and even > consensus, but conversation can form around data, rather than just opinion. > > If anyone wants to write a description of a test like this they want to > see, then you are always welcome to post it to MediaWiki.org or Meta, and > get our attention. Being bold and adding it to the list of planned > experiments > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_engagement_experimentsis > a good way to do so. :) > > Even if we may not always have the bandwidth to do these experiments > ourselves immediately, we are always happy to gather ideas for future work, > since we regularly have time to run smaller experiments on the side. We can > also help you set up an experiment and work through the data > collection/analysis cycle. > > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > -- Matthew Roth Global Communications Manager Wikimedia Foundation +1.415.839.6885 ext 6635 www.wikimediafoundation.org *https://donate.wikimedia.org* _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
