2012/4/25 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> > Thanks for sharing, I had read about it on the NYT but nothing was said on > license. > So now the USA have more open bibliographic data than Germany/Europe? :) > lobid.org is a very nice initiative, but other catalog systems have very > complex interactions between hundreds or thousands of entities and it's > very hard to change the licenses. > The main problem is usually deduplication and quality of the records, any > information on this for Harvard's data? > > Mateus Nobre, 25/04/2012 19:44: > >> Add ALL at Wikisource! >> > > Wikisource? This is only metadata. >
Perhaps it is OK for Wikidata. -- Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada. E-mail: emijrp AT gmail DOT com Pre-doctoral student at the University of Cádiz (Spain) Projects: AVBOT <http://code.google.com/p/avbot/> | StatMediaWiki<http://statmediawiki.forja.rediris.es> | WikiEvidens <http://code.google.com/p/wikievidens/> | WikiPapers<http://wikipapers.referata.com> | WikiTeam <http://code.google.com/p/wikiteam/> Personal website: https://sites.google.com/site/emijrp/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
