Hi Rohini, can you share some of your experiences, wrt to what Ashwin and
Vickram have pointed out?


On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Vickram Crishna
<[email protected]>wrote:

> As Ashwin points out, from the point of view of a partnership, this was
> less than a resounding success.
>
> However, Rohini does not call it a partnership, because it isn't one. This
> was a pilot, intended to demonstrate to persons of influence at BNHS what a
> partnership could achieve for the Society. The partnership lies ahead.
>
> Pradeep does not call it a partnership either, he squarely labels it a
> pilot, and suggests to Wikimedians everywhere that they initiate similar
> efforts with similar physical archives in other parts of India.
>
> It would have been exceedingly unrealistic to imagine that the philosophy
> of open knowledge be instantly understood and enthusiastically embraced.
> None of us did at any stage of this pilot, which we well understand to be a
> foot in the door. I was warned by other senior Wikimedians, recognised
> naturalists in their own right, as well as naturalists who are not
> Wikimedians, but know the Society well, that this would be an uphill task,
> long before we even took the first steps. Dissing the organisation for its
> traditional mindset is easy, but not fruitful.
>
> For all I know, it may be easier to do this elsewhere, with other
> organisations. And the very best to others who take up that challenge.
> Everyone should do what they can, when they can, wherever they can.
>
> This is a work in progress. And I wish Rohini the very best, every
> encouragement, to continue her efforts to get that door opened wider now.
>
> --
> Vickram
> Fool On The Hill communicall.wordpress.com
> " He's still watching me watching you watching ...
> And the way he stares - feel like locking my door
> and pulling my phone from the wall.
> His eyes, like lights from a laser, burn
> making my hair stand - making the goose-bumps crawl. "
> Jethro Tull: Watching Me Watching You (1982)
> On Aug 9, 2013 8:12 PM, "Ashwin Baindur" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From a point of view of GLAM partnership this was emphatically NOT a
>> success. It was not a complete failure also, because brave Rohini persisted
>> in the face of an unresponsive BNHS. In the end BNHS and Wikipedia got a
>> better article on Humayun Abdulali and Rohini got some hard-won experience
>> - that is all.
>>
>> But the potential for this project could have been so much greater. The
>> experiences of Wikipedians-in-residence in the Smithsonian and the British
>> Museum (and other initiatives) was so wonderful, so engaging to both sides
>> and so fruitful that the lacklustre report in the link Pradeep mentions
>> feels like ashes in one's mouth.
>>
>> BNHS has been for many years the iconic symbol of private wildlife
>> research. It has a very long history, had some truly wonderful people in it
>> including Salim Ali and Humayun Abdulali, has a very good library and a
>> very good collection of skins, shells, eggs etc. It has a peer-reviewed
>> scientific journal more than 100 years old which has high repute. It was
>> the place where eminent scientists like Johnsingh, Ravi Sankaran and Bharat
>> Bhushan, besides many others, began their careers or were encouraged.
>> Whether it is mammals, birds, reptiles, marine life or insects; anywhere in
>> India one can definitely say about BNHS - been there, done that!
>>
>> So one would expect BNHS to be open to the idea of helping Indians to
>> learn more about wildlife, nature, environment and conservation? Wrong.
>>
>> Check the site of BNHS for stuff which educates or informs or which
>> guides or helps and see the complete paucity of material. Its a nice enough
>> looking website & tells you very much what the organisation, its goals and
>> programmes, but there is zilch information about India's wildlife, from
>> India's premier wildlife NGO.  If you compare that with a comparable
>> organisation in the USA and UK say Audobon or RSPB, you will find they have
>> useful articles, knowledge material aside from what they are involved in.
>> Compare Audobon which gives Tips on how to get nature to the classroom or
>> taking schoolchildren outdoors, or RSPB which provides a complete bird list
>> with short writeup.
>>
>> BNHS does not have an altruistic outlook towards IP and the resources
>> they hold. The reason for that is not difficult to understand. BNHS
>> publishes a variety of handbooks, coffee-table books etc and their
>> employees derive additional income from their publication, sale of
>> photographs they take on BNHS funded trips etc, Hardly any activity in BNHS
>> comes without a pricetag for the participants. Standard copyright model is
>> their bread and butter.
>>
>> No wonder, they are not interested very much in joining hands with
>> Wikipedia - there is a direct conflict of interest, if Wikipedia develops
>> pages on India's natural heritage well, the need/dependence for their
>> handbooks reduces. This will affect sales in the long run and affect income
>> of the organisation and its staff.
>>
>> So Rohini's valiant attempt was akin to trying to clap with one hand. You
>> can't hear the clap because BNHS never showed any eagerness other than a
>> bureaucratic acquiescence grudgingly obtained after much effort by Rohini.
>> Imho, Rohini could probably have written the Abdulali article to the same
>> quality even without the cooperation of BNHS.
>>
>> It would be my advice to GLAM enthusiasts who put in humungous amount of
>> hours of drudgery work in GLAM projects to please not take up pilots with
>> organisations which do not value the importance of Commons, common heritage
>> and public domain.
>>
>> Ashwin Baindur
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Pradeep Mohandas <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> It was announced earlier that a Wikipedian from Mumbai, Rohini Lakshane
>>> was working with the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) on a GLAM pilot
>>> project. I am happy to inform you that this is now completed. A short note
>>> on the pilot was posted here -
>>> http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/July_2013/Contents/India_report
>>>
>>> It will be great to do similar projects in other cultural and/or
>>> scientific institutions in your city. If you need help from the Chapter in
>>> doing this, please feel free to contact me on this email id.
>>>
>>> warm regards,
>>> Pradeep Mohandas
>>>
>>> Pradeep Mohandas
>>> How Pradeep uses email? - http://goo.gl/6v1I9
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Warm regards,
>>
>> Ashwin Baindur
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>


-- 
Srikanth Ramakrishnan
Treasurer,
Wikimedia Chapter [India]

Donate to the Wikimedia India Chapter today<http://wiki.wikimedia.in/Donations>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum

Reply via email to