On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Lodewijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is only one body that can make funding commitments: the WMF board of > trustees. > Not quite true on a number of levels :) The Board doesn't directly make funding commitments, it approves them – and wholesale, not line by line. It would hardly change its approval of an annual budget based on how this 1% of the budget is allocated to travel+events. The ED could make a meaningful commitment on this front. As could the broader community of potential organizers and regional organizations. For instance, a city with regional support & access to a great & inexpensive venue could commit to host a Wikimania in any year when there wasn't a suitable bid elsewhere. > Wikimania doesn't have to stand or fall with WMF funding. > Right. More specifically, if Wikimania is billed as a costly WMF line-item, organizers will plan for it and attendees will expect it (whatever that means - opulence, ticket prices, number of attendees fully subsidized by the WMF [whether via scholarship or otherwise]). If it isn't, people will plan and design the conferences differently. Also noted in the roundtable discussion: WordPress has an interesting model with hundreds of self-funding regional meetings a year, and two international meetings, all of which are significantly lower overhead than Wikimanias but still great community events, fun & productive. The primary costs of any con are airfare and lodging. If we make sure that everyone is close to a multinational event hosted somewhere with simple travel & lodging options, whether or not they attend The Largest International Gathering (or whether indeed there is a single one) makes less of a difference. SJ
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
