Sounds like a great Page/Data/Media interplay, of interest to Wikispore if
there's any need for customization.  SJ

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Adam Sobieski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> A “Wikifacts” sister project is a great idea. “Wikifacts” seems distinct
> from both Wikinews and Wikidata. With some schemas for facts, defining
> their structure and interrelations, one could, however, utilize Wikidata as
> a backend.
>
>
>
> Brainstorming, while I’m sure that those in these mailing lists are more
> familiar with what’s possible with wiki templates, with a “Wikifacts”
> sister project, one could envision a wiki template for explicit facts.
> Perhaps such a wiki template could resemble:
>
>
>
> {{fact|User content goes here.}}
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> {{fact|F12345678|User content goes here.}}
>
>
>
> With such a wiki template, editors could add explicit facts to Wikinews
> and Wikipedia articles.
>
>
>
> End-users could hover over explicit facts in Wikinews or Wikipedia
> articles to view information (e.g. the number of informational messages,
> warnings, or errors) about the facts in tooltips and could click on a fact
> – or on a superscript hyperlink symbol – to navigate to the fact’s
> “Wikifacts” article.
>
>
>
> The use of explicit facts in Wikinews or Wikipedia articles could,
> potentially, create new “Wikifacts” articles or synchronize with existing
> “Wikifacts” articles. Whenever a fact were updated or annotated via the
> “Wikifacts” project website, the editors of any dependent Wikinews or
> Wikipedia articles could receive emails, resembling how they can opt to
> watch articles for edits. Wikinews and Wikipedia editors could receive
> emails so as to be able to revisit an article if or when any facts upon
> which the article depends change.
>
>
>
> A “Wikifacts” project could also serve as a fact-checking resource for a
> set of end-users broader than the editors of Wikinews and Wikipedia
> articles. Through an API, end-users could perform real-time fact checking
> via “Wikifacts” while authoring or reviewing documents.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> P.S.: Thank you for the information about the Wikipragmatica proposal.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Douglas Clark <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Thursday, February 4, 2021 6:50 PM
> *To: *Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [Wikimedia-l] Idea of a new project: Wikifacts ?
>
>
>
> I proposed a project, WikiPragmatica
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipragmatica>, that can support fake
> news detection. The retained context of the paraphrase graph can identify
> fake news patterns similar to what MIT does with their detector.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:42 PM Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does Wikinews cover this aspect?
>
> *From:* Wikimedia-l <[email protected]> on behalf
> of Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:20 PM
> *To:* Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Chris Gates <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Wikimedia-l] Idea of a new project: Wikifacts ?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Independent of my opinions on the validity of such a new Wikimedia
> project, there is currently an experiment of similar goals (and potentially
> structure) over at Twitter:
>
>
>
>
> https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2021/introducing-birdwatch-a-community-based-approach-to-misinformation.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Verm
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Leinonen Teemu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Has there been any discussion to start a new Wikimedia project focusing on
> fact checking?
>
> Fact checking of course is in the core of editing Wikipedia, but I was
> thinking about dedicated wiki-site that is dedicated for fact checking of
> current events and news. Why this would be important?
>
> (1) There are many fact checking site in the English speaking world but
> much less elsewhere. I am afraid that there is still greater need for fact
> checking in the rest of the world. {{Citation needed}}
>
> (2) Our community is very well educated to do fact checking the wiki-way.
> Again internationally, many of our community members are real fact
> champions in their home countries and language groups. The practice of
> Wikipedia could be applied to fact checking of fast moving current events
> and news, too.
>
> (3) This could help us to get new young people to the movement, as editing
> Wikipedias is not anymore so easy to start (because they are so good
> already).
>
> (4) In many parts of the world, fact checking can also be dangerous. With
> our anonymous and community driven practices and services we could protect
> the fact checkers in many parts of the world.
>
> I am not sure what is the state of the Wikinews, but my impression is that
> it is not really working. It was a good idea, but maybe wiki or wiki-way is
> not the way to produce news. Also the beautiful idea of citizen journalism
> has not really become reality. Maybe we could try if wiki and the wki-way
> works better in fact checking.
>
> Peace,
>
>          - Teemu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>


-- 
Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to