On 4/17/07, Alexey Maksimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks.
I found a comment by Jonathan Locke claiming that Wicket is 17.4%
faster than tapestry.
>From my local tests on simple 'hello world' applications on tomcat,
I got results showing that tapestry 4.0 is approximately 60% faster
than wicket 1.2.5.
Where can I get details of those benchmarks?
see here
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-benchmark/
it has a jmeter script that executes the benchmark.
Maybe I missed option like 'wicket-speed = 2x'? ;-)
maybe you missed the point. a servlet is probably the best solution for
building a helloworld webapp.
I'm quite new to wicket and I like the concept.
glad to hear it
However I'm going to build an application that serves many clients at
once, so I think performance matters. Is it possible to create
a large scalable application with wicket?
no it is not. wicket is only good for small hobby projects that hope to
serve at most five concurrent users.
-igor
Thanks.
Best regards,
Alex.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
