Well, has it occurred to you that hello world might not be the best test-case for a benchmark?
-Matej On 4/17/07, Alexey Maksimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks. > > I found a comment by Jonathan Locke claiming that Wicket is 17.4% > faster than tapestry. > >From my local tests on simple 'hello world' applications on tomcat, > I got results showing that tapestry 4.0 is approximately 60% faster > than wicket 1.2.5. > > Where can I get details of those benchmarks? > Maybe I missed option like 'wicket-speed = 2x'? ;-) > > I'm quite new to wicket and I like the concept. > However I'm going to build an application that serves many clients at > once, so I think performance matters. Is it possible to create > a large scalable application with wicket? > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Alex. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
