Before wicket processing or after? the after processing you can see here: prod.jobindsats.dk a user case could be:
1.
select starthjælp from the left menu(this brings you to our wicket
application in the middle frame)
2.
select databank radio
3.
select the Tilbagefald radio
4.
press the submit button called næste
There are some further steps, but this should make you see what the trouble are
with the radios, by selecting the tilbagefald radio you also submit the
page(this populates the info field), after the submit of the page then the
radios gets new numbers.
I also have the jMeter testplan if you want to
see it?
Hmm, it might be easier if I just took a look at your script? Also I dont want
you to put in too much work on this(theres no need for it, since customer has
accepted to rebuild the test plan each time).
regards Nino
________________________________
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Peter Thomas
Sendt: ti 03-04-2007 11:11
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Radio.getValue?
Ok, once I manage to get something on the wiki (hopefully soon), I'll notify
the mailing list.
Meanwhile Nino - if you can send me separately a couple of different samples of
HTML of the page you are trying to test, I can have a look to see if I have a
solution using JMeter.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 4/3/07, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We also can test without trouble, as long as the underlying data does
not change. I guess this depends on how the application are built.
But if you have something to add, we have created an entry on the wiki
please feel free to add stuff to it.
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-and-jmeter.html
regards Nino
________________________________
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Peter Thomas
Sendt: ti 03-04-2007 10:43
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Radio.getValue?
Hi Nino,
Sorry I was not following this thread from the start - but recently I
had some success using JMeter for testing a wicket application by using the
regular expression support built into JMeter. My test script actually can use
the "wicket:id" values and so far I'm getting good results.
Let me know if you need more details.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 4/3/07, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I am using Jmeter, but the whole trouble originates by that
data are changeing. And in production it would not make sense for it to remain
stable, but some of it are stable and this is what we are wanting to test.
Currently we have agreed that we only run one test (orginal we had 15
individual tests) which needs to be recreated / or manipulated with the correct
radio id's. Im wondering since no one else seems to have these problems, they
have either not used the radio / check components or does not performance test
this way? Is this an uncommon way to performance test over time?
regards Nino
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
<<winmail.dat>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
