> Why is there no set methods on the request cycle like there is for session > and application?Yes, that is an interesting point. Just grew like that I guess. But having a set method wouldn't really help your case, right?
It would help, because I have a Request Cycle container that keeps track of the current cycle. And I would be able to do RequestCycle.set so that Wicket is able to access the RequestCycle itself too. Could the Wicket team change RequestCycle so that either: 1) There is a public or protected static set method in RequestCycle 2) Make the ThreadLocal current inside RequestCycle protected Robert
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
