it is a copy, what we did was take out whatever pieces we needed from the
commons-upload. that way we dont have an extra dependency and we only use
the small portion that we need.
-igor
On 3/2/07, MadDog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wicket's FileUpload component appears to be an exact copy(or very close
copy)
of the Apache Commons FileUpload component. What are the
differences? Why
doesn't Wicket just use Apache Commons FileUpload?
-MadDog
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Difference-between-Wicket-FileUpload-and-Apache-Commons-FileUpload-tf3335183.html#a9274948
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
