yeah maybe we should because that those 2 really should be the same thing
if not then it doesn't work, so it invites bugs..
johan
On 2/25/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mount("/item", new IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy("/item",
> ItemViewPage.class));
>
> 1) From looking at the above, the mount path appears to be
redundant. Is
> there any particular reason
Nope, just the way it grew. We fixed that for for Wicket 2.0, but
didn't backport it. Maybe if there is enough interest, we could.
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
